NAM vs Tonex 1.7.5 hi-gain comparison (13 dBu)
Amp Head Capture
NAM
2dor
5 months ago
Description
Direct profile I shot to compare my real Ceriatone Molecular 50W to NAM and ToneX. I used the same amp & settings to reamp & train NAM and ToneX back to back. Trained for 200 epochs: ESR is 0.009932 I reamped the same DI through the real amp, NAM profile and ToneX. Tracks are available here (use the same IR with each): https://mega.nz/file/uhoG1boa#0SKcCUPtaRE3ly0paszN5ZG4E6VoKH0QlVZj1nyAHlM ToneX profile is here: https://www.tone.net/tonex/tonemodels/64991 Reamp chain details: • RME Fireface UCX II -> SignalArt reamp box -> Ceriatone Molecular 50W (Variant, RO) -> St.Rock React:IR II -> RME Fireface UCX II • Calibrated for 13 dBu • Great video on how to use the calibration (dBu) value: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4rn4pXpNzg4 Uses the standard NAM profile architecture.
Makes and Models
Ceriatone Molecular 50WPreview
Models
Each model captures the gear at specific settings.
Standard
License: T3K
Users may download and use the data file in software and publish the resulting outputs without royalties or restrictions. However, they may not upload, republish, or distribute the data file without the author's permission.
